检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国计划生育学杂志》2012年第8期548-549,共2页Chinese Journal of Family Planning
摘 要:目的:探讨微柱凝胶技术对新生儿溶血病(HDN)的诊断价值。方法:选取128例疑似HDN的新生儿,分别用微柱凝胶法和传统试管法进行直接抗人球蛋白试验(DAT)、间接抗人球蛋白试验(IAT)和放散试验并对比结果。结果:在128例中104例诊断为HDN患儿,微柱凝胶法的阳性检出率为92.31%,传统试管法为80.77%,微柱凝胶法的敏感性高于传统试管法(χ2=5.92,P<0.05);在微柱凝胶法3项试验中,以放散试验的阳性率最高,DAT阳性率最低。结论:对于辅助诊断HDN,微柱凝胶法比传统试管法更具优势。Objective : To explore the value of the microcolumn gel technology in diagnosing hemolytic disease of the newborn. Methods : The direct antiglobulin test ( DAT), indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) and elution test were conducted with the microcolumn gel technology and the traditional method in 128 newborns suspected hemolytic disease of the newborn. Results: In 104 newborns with clinical diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the newborn, the positive rates of the microcolumn gel technology and the traditional method were 92.31% and 80.77% (X2 = 5.92, P 〈 0.05). As for three methods with the microcolumn gel technology, the positive rate of the elution test was the highest and that of DAT was the lowest. Conclusion: A microcolumn gel technology is better for assistant diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the newborn when compared with the traditional method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3