所有权与自然垄断产业规制——组合模式及选择  

Ownership and the Regulation of Natural Monopoly——Regulatory Models and Its Application

作　　者：陆军荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院部门经济研究所,上海200020

出　　处：《中国工业经济》2012年第8期30-42,共13页China Industrial Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"国有企业的产业经济学分析"(批准号08CJL015)

摘　　要：对于自然垄断产业采用何种所有权结构的规制模式,在理论研究与实践操作中都存在着多样化的选择。本文主要比较分析了民营外生规制、国有内生规制和混合所有权规制三种不同组合模式,并认为混合所有权规制模式较好地兼容了其他模式的优点,可以成为自然垄断产业改革与治理进程中的一个可取路径。欧盟国家自然垄断产业的改革经验,从实践上证明了混合所有权规制模式的可行性,尽管其也存在一定的局限性。同时,本文认为对于转型改革时期的中国,针对自然垄断行业的国有企业,可以考虑采用混合所有权规制模式的改革路径,通过股权开放的形式放松民营资本进入自然垄断产业的行业管制,并有效、平稳地建立起自然垄断产业规制体系。There are diversified choices on which kind of ownership structure should be applied to the natural monopoly regulatory regime. This paper would design and analyze three typical regulatory models： external regulatory model with private ownership （ERM）, internal regulatory model with state ownership （IRM） and mixed ownership regulatory model （MRM）. The mixed ownership regulatory model could be the appropriate choice on most situations because it contains the merits of two others. EU＇s experiences have showed that mixed ownership regulatory model could be a feasible way, although it still has some shortcomings. As China is in the process of transition and reformation, the mixed ownership regulatory model is especially suitable for the reform of SOE in monopoly industries. It could set up the regulatory regime effectively and stably when monopoly industries are opening to the private investors.

关 键 词：自然垄断 规制 混合所有权 国有企业 

分 类 号：F014.9[经济管理—政治经济学]