检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室.北京100875 [2]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2012年第4期559-561,563,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家科技基础性工作专项重点项目(2006FY110400)
摘 要:目的:了解中国儿童青少年身体攻击的发生状况。方法:利用中国儿童青少年心理发育特征调查数据库,对23753名中国4—9年级学生的身体攻击进行潜在类别分析,并对不同身体攻击类别在不同性别和年级内的分布进行差异检验。结果:①4—9年级学生的身体攻击分为三个潜在类别:高发组、边缘组和低发组,比例分别为:5.2%、36.7%、58.1%;②男生高发组、边缘组的比例(4.5%、44.6%)显著高于女生(1.9%、22.8%);③4—9年级学生高发组的比例在6.8%-1.4%,呈现随年级升高而下降的趋势,边缘组的比例在30.2%-37.0%。结论:身体攻击可以分为三类,每个类别在不同性别和年级内部的分布不同。Objective: To investigate the prevalence of physical aggression in Chinese adolescents. Methods: The data used in this study were from database of the National Children' s Study of China (NCSC). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore types of physical aggression of 23,753 students in fourth-to-ninth-grade, and Percentage Difference Test was employed to investigate the difference of frequency in different gender and grade. Results: (1)According to LCA, fourth-to-ninth-grade students' physical aggression could be divided into three groups, namely, High-risk group, Medium-risk group, low-risk group, the prevalence were 5.2%, 36.7%, 5g.1%, respectively. (2)The prevalence of High-risk group and Medium-risk group of boys(4.5%,44.6%) was significantly higher than girls(1.9%, 22.8%). (3)Within fourth-toninth-grade, the prevalence of High-risk group was 1.4% to 6.8%, showing a decline with the increasing of grade, and the prevalence of Medium-risk group was 30.2% to 37.0%. Conclusion: Physical aggression can be classified into three different types; The prevalences of each type is different in different gender and grade.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15