岩画的“艺术”问题——兼与石华龙先生商榷  

“Art” in the Rock Art-Discussion with Shi Hualong

作　　者：杨超[1] 

机构地区：[1]三峡大学中国岩画研究中心,湖北宜昌443002

出　　处：《学术界》2012年第8期116-125,287-288,共10页Academics

摘　　要：本文基于石华龙先生批判阿纳蒂教授岩画的"艺术"是"早期智人艺术自觉"和"为艺术而艺术"的产物,并得出"史前岩画并非原始的绘画艺术,它只是生活在史前时期远古人类图式交流的一种文本遗存",笔者以此为出发点,根据石先生引用的材料、对阿纳蒂的认识和史前"艺术"的理解三个方面给予了论述,认为石华龙先生的有些推论是武断的,并就岩画的"艺术"向石先生求教。The thesis is based on criticizing from Shi Hualong thought Rock Art Research of Prof.Anati,which is 'Art for art’s sake' and reaching a conclusion 'prehistoric Rock Art is not art of primitive painting,which is only the text remains for communication by the picture between the prehistoric mankind',and a different ideal is put forward.Quotes of Shi Hualong,Rock art research of cognition from Prof.Anati and 'Art' in prehistory as proofs obtaining a result,some conclusions from Shi Hualong are arbitrary,and disuse the 'Art' of Rock Art with Shi Hualong.

关 键 词：阿纳蒂 岩画 “艺术”问题 商榷 

分 类 号：J219[艺术—美术]