检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第8期1130-1131,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的探讨放松疗法对抑郁症患者的临床疗效。方法将120例抑郁症患者随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组进行常规抗抑郁药物治疗,观察组在此基础上合用放松治疗。在治疗前和治疗后2、4、6、8周用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM D)对疗效进行评定对比。结果观察组在第2周时症状即出现明显改善(t=27.67,P<0.01)并持续改善至治疗结束;对照组在4周时症状才出现改善(t=7.11,P<0.01),并且在各观察时间段改善程度均明显低于观察组。结论药物基础上合用放松治疗法能更快更有效地改善患者的临床症状。Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of relaxation therapy for depression patients.Methods According to admission order,120 case depression patient were randomly assigned into two groups:study group and control group.study group was given regular medication plus relax therapy,control group was given regular medication plus common nursing care education.Before therapy and after therapy 2,4,6,8 weekend.Using HAMD to assess effect.Results Symptoms of study group in the first two weeks improved significantly(t=27.67,P〈0.01),and showed continuous improvement to the end of treatment;Symptoms of control group only 4 weeks appeared the improvement(t=7.11,P〈0.01),and improvement of each observation time were significantly lower than the observation group.Conclusion The relaxation therapy is effective to depression patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28