检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨凯[1] 邢海柱[1] 张瑶婵[1] 杨琛[1] 梁涛[1] 曹建槽[1] 潘斌[1]
出 处:《中国医学装备》2012年第8期78-80,共3页China Medical Equipment
摘 要:目的:为降低中心血站照明能耗,对隔栅灯具及其他传统灯具进行改造,并保证相同或相近的照度。方法:选择更换不同功率的LED节能灯,并用功率分析仪对改造前后的灯具功率分别进行测试。结果:改造后各种灯具节电50.01%~76.75%,其中60×60格栅灯改造更换成LED节能灯后,节电达76.75%,是所有灯具改造中最高的;9W节能灯更换为4WLED节能灯后,节电50.01%,是所有改造中最低的;平均电费降低65.46%。本次灯具改造共花费12.1108万元,改造后每年节约电费15.44万元,不到10个月收回全部改造成本,并得到政府节能专项补助5万元。结论:LED节能灯照明效果较好,质量可靠,改造后节电效果显著。Objective: To reduce the energy consumption of lighting units. Methods: We replaced the grille lamps and other conventional lighting with LED lights, and compared the results by using a power analyzer. Results: The use of LED lighting had remarkable advantages: -the energy efficiency rate of replaced lighting ranges between 50.01% - 76.75%; -the maximum energy efficiency rate of replaced lighting is 76.75%;the minimum energy efficiency rate of replaced lighting is 50.0%;-the average cost of electricity was reduced by 65.46%:- the cost of refurbishment was 12,1108.00 RMB; - 154,400.00 RMB could be savedannually on the electricity bill by using the converted lighting;- the full cost of refurbishment will be recovered within 10 months. Conclusion: LED lighting has higher quality, is more efficient, and enables remarkable energy savings.
分 类 号:TM923[电气工程—电力电子与电力传动]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222