检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北省荆州市第一人民医院ICU,434000
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2012年第15期13-15,共3页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:探讨程序化管理护理干预措施在ICU机械通气患者中的应用效果,以提高护理质量和患者满意度。方法:ICU机械通气患者根据护理方式不同分为观察组和对照组,观察组103例行护理程序化管理,对照组83例行常规护理,比较两组机械通气时间、ICU监护时间及院内感染、呼吸机相关性肺炎发生情况,并对护理服务满意度进行评价。结果:观察组机械通气时间和ICU监护时间分别为(5.54±1.31)d和(6.07±1.82)d,其院内感染、呼吸机相关肺炎及死亡病例的发生率分别为12.62%,5.83%,1.94%,与对照组比较均有统计学意义;观察组患者对护理质量的满意度明显提高,两组比较差异有统计学意义。结论:程序化管理护理干预措施应用于ICU机械通气患者效果明显。Objective:To explore the application effect of taking programming management for patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU, to improve the nursing quality and patient's satisfaction. Methods:Pationts of mechanical ventilation in ICU were randomly divided into the observation group and control group, the conventional nursing were taken in the control group, the observation group made nursing programming management, to compared the nursing quality between the two group. Results:The time of mechanical ventilation was (5.54 ± 1. 31 ) days and I CU custody was (6.07 ±1. 82) days, the rate of infection hospital was 12.62%, VAP was 5.83% and death was 1.94% in the observation group,compared with the control group had statistical signifiance. The patients in the obseratien group on satisfaction of nursing quality improved obviously ,compared the two groups have signifiance. Conclusion :The effectiveness of taking programming management for patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU is obvious.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145