《中华人民共和国刑法》第156条“通谋”司法解释之我见  

On the Judicial Interpretation of “Collusion” in Article 156 of the Criminal Law of China

作　　者：杨方泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院

出　　处：《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第4期134-138,共5页JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION

摘　　要：司法解释对《中华人民共和国刑法》(以下简称《刑法》)第156条"通谋"的理解有自相矛盾之嫌,一方面将"通谋"扩大解释为共同犯罪故意的形成;另一方面认为"通谋"包括"明知"和"多次帮助"的情形,从而将没有意思联络即没有形成共同犯罪故意的帮助行为包括进来。司法解释对"通谋"的解释结论实际上是一种司法拟制,违反了罪行法定原则。从中立帮助行为理论的角度看,司法解释的结论也不妥当,因为只有不适当地增大了法益侵害危险的中立帮助行为才能以共同犯罪论处。The judicial interpretation of ＂Collusion＂ in Article 156 of the Criminal Law of China is self-contradictory.It has on the one hand expanded the scope of collusion to include any intention for accomplice while on the other hand believes that collusion includes ＂knowingly＂ and ＂repeated assistance＂,thus aids given with no intention of accomplice are included as well.The judicial interpretation of ＂collusion＂ is actually a judicial fiction and violates the principle of deciding a crime in accordance with the Criminal Law.Seen from the conduct of neutral aid,the judicial interpretation is also improper because only those conducts of aid that have intensified invasion into others＇ legitimate rights should be punished as accomplice.

关 键 词：走私罪 通谋 片面共犯 中立帮助行为 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]