两种生态足迹模型在三峡库区可持续发展评价中应用与比较分析  

Application and Comparison of Two Ecological Footprint Models in Assessment of Sustainable Development in TGP Reservoir Area

作　　者：王丽[1] 谢世友[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学地理科学学院,重庆400715 [2]西南大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室,重庆400715

出　　处：《西南大学学报（自然科学版）》2012年第7期82-87,共6页Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAC01A16);国家林业局948项目(2009-4-20);重庆市自然科学基金重点项目(CSTC2009BA0002)

摘　　要：将传统生态足迹模型和能值生态足迹模型分别应用于三峡库区的可持续发展性研究中,选取重庆市涪陵区作为研究区域,对其2008年的生态足迹进行具体的计算与对比分析,结果表明:用能值生态足迹模型和传统生态足迹模型计算得出研究区分别存在4.35hm2/cap和1.846hm2/cap的生态赤字,这说明三峡库区的发展处于一种不可持续状态,针对这种情况提出相应的措施并简要讨论了两种生态足迹模型的优缺点.The traditional ecological footprint model and the energy ecological footprint model are separately applied in a study of the sustainable development of TGP （Three Gorges Project） Reservoir Area. With Fuling district of Chongqing municipality as the study zone, this paper calculates its ecological footprint in 2008, and compares the results obtained by the two models. The ecological deficits of Fuling district in 2008 based on emergy and conventional ecological footprint models were 2.73 and 1. 846 hm2/cap, respectively, both being above its carrying capacity, which indicates that the development of the study zone is unsustainable. The advantages and disadvantages of the two {ootprint models are discussed in this paper and some proposal for improvement are offered.

关 键 词：传统生态足迹模型 能值生态足迹模型 三峡库区 可持续发展 

分 类 号：Q149[生物学—生态学]