“中国档案分类法”与“中国图书馆分类法”辅助符号之比较  

Comparison of Auxiliary Symbols between Chinese Archives Classification and Chinese Library Classification

作　　者：张萌[1] 甄薇[2] 

机构地区：[1]石家庄职业技术学院组织部,河北石家庄050081 [2]石家庄职业技术学院图书馆,河北石家庄050081

出　　处：《江苏海洋大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2012年第11期137-139,共3页Journal of Jiangsu Ocean University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition）

摘　　要：档案分类同图书分类一样,都要用到各种辅助符号,以确保类目的指向更加准确。"中国档案分类法"和"中国图书馆分类法"都采用了10余种辅助符号,两种分类法的辅助符号之间,既有联系,又有区别。Like books classification, various kinds of auxiliary symbols are also needed in the courge of ar- chives classification, so as to guarantee the accuracy of the category directions. Both Chinese Arcnives Classification and Chinese Library Classification adopt more than 10 kinds of auxiliary symbols, and there are connections and differences between these auxiliary symbols.

关 键 词：“中国档案分类法” “中国图书馆分类法” 辅助符号 比较研究 

分 类 号：G272.5[文化科学—档案学] G254.1