监狱惩罚机能与改造机能的冲突与融合  

Conflict and Integration in Punishment and Rehabilitation Function of Prison

作　　者：刘崇亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院刑事司法学院,上海201701

出　　处：《河北法学》2012年第9期15-22,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：刘崇亮主持的2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<监狱惩罚机能的限制--以权力的规范配置为分析视角>(12YJC820060)阶段性成果;刘崇亮主持的2012年上海政法学院院级课题<监狱;罪犯与市民社会的三维架构与互动--以目的为主的综合改造刑论>的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国传统刑罚执行理论中关于对惩罚与改造关系的认识存在着理论缺陷,监狱惩罚作为手段违背了行刑本质机能与次生机能的逻辑关系,并会造成刑罚目的的异化。惩罚机能和改造机能存在着本来的冲突,惩罚机能强调共性,改造机能强调个性,两者在制度的支撑上也存在着冲突。但在现代社会条件下,惩罚机能与改造机能又可以高度融合,因为两者在目标与生成社会性基础上具有统一性。惩罚与改造的最终目标都在于使罪犯顺利重返社会,惩罚的内化需求和改造的外化动力为当代监狱的社会功能需求奠定了深刻的社会性生成基础。There is defect in traditional execution of theory on relationship between punishment and transformation. It violates logical relationship between essential function and secondary function that prison punishment is regarded as means, and will result in alienation of penal purpose. There is an original conflict between punishment and transformation function that punishment function stressed communion but transformation stressed individuality. In modern social conditions, they both can be a high degree of integration, since they are unified in target and social basis. Punishment and transformation share ultimate goal that is to make offenders successful reintegration, the internal demand of punishment and external motivation lays the profound social foundation for contemporary prison function.

关 键 词：刑罚执行 惩罚机能 改造机能 冲突与融合 

分 类 号：D926.7[政治法律—法学]