检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科,100730
出 处:《北京医学》2012年第8期651-653,共3页Beijing Medical Journal
基 金:北京医药产品和技术重大项目培育研究(Z101107050210030)
摘 要:目的比较两种丙泊酚靶控输注药代/药效模型Marsh、Schnider在老年患者眼底手术镇静中的应用。方法 65岁以上眼底手术患者42例,随机分为M组、S组,分别使用Marsh、Schnider模型,以靶控输注丙泊酚血浆浓度0.4μg/ml为起点,达到靶控浓度目标值后每分钟增加0.1μg/ml,直至达到OAA/S评分3分。记录此时个体的丙泊酚血浆浓度、效应室浓度、脑电双频指数(BIS)值、无创血压、心率、脉搏血氧饱和度。结果 OAA/S评分3分时,丙泊酚血浆浓度EC95Schnider模型高于Marsh模型(P<0.05);效应室浓度EC50和EC95Schnider模型均高于Marsh模型(P<0.05);两组患者血压均明显低于入室基础值(P<0.05)。结论老年患者使用丙泊酚靶控镇静,在OAA/S评分3分时,丙泊酚Marsh模型效应室浓度低于Schnider模型效应室浓度。Objective To compare the two PK/PD models, Marsh and Schnider, with propofol TCI sedation in elderly patients with eye fundus operation. Methods Forty-two patients who were older than 65 years old and underwent selective eye fundus operation were randomized into two groups, the M group and the S group. Patients were sedated with propofol by Marsh and Schnider TCI model. The propofol was started at a plasma concentration of 0.4μg/ml, and increased by 0.1 μg/ml every one min until the score was 3 based on the OAAS score. Probity regression was used to estimate population values for the two PK/PD models. Results Plasma concentration EC95 was higher with Sehnider model than Marsh model. The effect-site concentration of EC50 and EC95 was higher with the Sehnider model than the Marsh model. Conclusion In elderly patients, if the OAA/S score 3 is taken as the end point, the effect-site concentrations of propofol are 0.8 μg,/ml and 1.2 μg/ml respectively with Marsh model and Sehnider model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147