检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪崇淼[1] 吴耀持[1] 张峻峰[1] 黄承飞[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院针推伤科,上海200233
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2012年第8期591-592,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:上海市科委重大课题(10DZ1950700)
摘 要:目的观察穴位注射配合牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法将122例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为3组,观察组42例,进行穴位注射配合牵引治疗;穴位注射组40例,进行穴位注射治疗;牵引组40例进行牵引治疗。治疗结束比较3组间疗效差异。结果观察组总有效率为92.9%,穴位注射组总有效率为72.5%,牵引组总有效率为75.0%,观察组总有效率与穴位注射组、牵引组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),穴位注射组与牵引组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论穴位注射配合牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病总有效率优于单纯穴位注射及单纯牵引治疗。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture point injection plus traction in treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Method One hundred and twenty-two patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were randomly allocated to three groups. The observation group of 42 patients received acupuncture point injection plus traction. The acupuncture point injection group of 40 patients and the traction group of 40 patients received corresponding treatments. The therapeutic effects were compared between the three groups after treatment. Result The total efficacy rate was 92.9% in the observation group, 72.5% in the acupuncture point injection group and 75.0% in the traction group; there was a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the acupuncture point injection group or the traction group (P 〈0.05); there was no statistically significant difference between the acupuncture point injection group and the traction group (P〉0.05). Conclusion The total efficacy rate of acupuncture point injection plus traction for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is higher than that of acupuncture point injection alone and that of traction alone.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233