检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张泽荣[1]
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2012年第8期593-594,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察痧点埋线治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法将64例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组32例,治疗组于刮痧后采用痧点埋线法治疗,对照组则采用常规单纯针刺治疗。结果治疗组痊愈率为71.9%,对照组为37.5%,治疗组优于对照组(P<0.01);治疗组多在第1疗程痊愈(P<0.05),对照组多在第2、3疗程痊愈(P<0.05)。结论痧点埋线无论在痊愈率还是在疗程方面都优于单纯针刺。Objective To investigate the efficacy of catgut embedding at scraping-caused ecchymotic skin in treating cervical spondylosis. Method Sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups, 32 cases each. The treatment group received catgut embedding at ecchymotic skin after scraping and the control group, conventional acupuncture. Result The cure rate was 71.9% in the treatment group and 37.5% in the control group. It was higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P〈0.01). Cure often occurred during the first course of treatment in the treatment group and during the second or third course of treatment in the control group. Conclusion No matter it is in the therapeutic effect, or in the number of sessions, catgut embedding at scraping-caused ecchymotic skin is superior to acupuncture.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117