《神农本草经》与宋本《伤寒论》术类药差异分析  

Difference analysis of herb 'zhu' between Shennong's Herbal Classic and Treatise on Febrile Disease of Song dynasty

作　　者：杨金萍[1] 王振国[1] 卢星[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东中医药大学,济南250355

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2012年第8期2009-2011,共3页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(No.2007CB512601)~~

摘　　要：《神农本草经》应反映张仲景时代用药情况,但与宋本《伤寒论》术类药之间存在差异,《神农本草经》术类药作"术",而宋本《伤寒论》术类药则作"白术"。结合汉魏六朝乃至宋代各个时期的本草方书,说明汉代术类药物只有术而没有白术,六朝以后始分苍、白术,至宋代则明确区分苍、白术。宋本《伤寒论》出现白术,固然有宋人臆改的因素,但根本原因是药物分化及品种变迁的结果。There are differences between Shennong＇s Herbal Classic and Treatise on Febrile Disease of Song dynasty about the herb of ＇zhu＇.The herb of ＇zhu＇ in Shennong＇s Herbal Classic named ＇zhu＇,but in Treatise on Febrile Disease in Song dynasty it was named ＇baizhu＇.Combined with materia medica formulary from Han Wei and Six Dynasties to Song dynasty showed that,the herbal of ＇zhu＇ in Han dynasty wasn＇t ＇baizhu＇ but ＇zhu＇.＇Cangzhu＇ and ＇baizhu＇ were begun to be divided after Six dynasties and were clearly separated in Song dynasty.In Treatise on Febrile Disease of Song dynasty appeared ＇baizhu＇,it was true that the factors were someone changed it in Song dynasty,but the root causes were the herb differentiation and the results of varieties changes.

关 键 词：神农本草经 宋代 伤寒论 术 差异 

分 类 号：R281[医药卫生—中药学] R222[医药卫生—中医学]