检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖洪[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第5期97-101,共5页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:"违法性认识"学说主要有四种观点,但这四种观点实际殊途同归,都是要求构成故意犯罪需要具备社会危害性的认识,"违法性认识"作为一个构成犯罪故意的要素来说可以不必存在。因此,应该重新定位"违法性认识"在中国刑法中的地位和作用,"违法性认识"仅指"刑事违法性认识",欠缺"违法性认识"不再作为一个认定是否构成犯罪的情节,而是作为行政犯一个量刑从轻或减轻情节。There are four perspectives on the "knowledge of illegality",but the four perspectives are actually the same thing.They are requested to need understanding of the social harm with consituting a deliberate crime.So "knowledge of illegality" as a element to constitute a crime could not exist.It should therefore be re-positioned "knowledge of illegality" position and role in China's criminal law."Knowledge of illegality" refers only to "criminal knowledge of illegality".The lack of "knowledge of illegalit" is no longer as a circumstance determining a crime,but as a circumstance with sentencing mitigation or mitigating in the executive crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13