检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李婕[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072
出 处:《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》2012年第7期64-70,共7页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
摘 要:水污染致癌作为环境公害犯罪的典型代表,应以以危险方法危害公共安全罪处罚。传统的条件说无法排除水污染以外的致癌因素,疫学因果关系要求被告人举证倒置,无法适用到中国的刑法领域。为达到"排除合理怀疑"的证明标准,需借助客观归责理论中的危险升高理论来进行环境公害案件的客观归责。现代刑法理论中的"故意"呈客观化趋势,可根据客观证据认定被告人主观上具有故意及证明被告人有不法认识可能性,从而完成环境公害案件的主观归责。The phenomenon of cancer villages as a resuh of polluted water is a typical type of environmental hazard crimes, which should be punished by the crime of endangering public security by dangerous means. Traditional theory of condition can not exclucle other factors that may devote to cancers except polluted water. Causal relationship of epidemiology that requires the inversion of burden proof can not be used in Chinese criminal law field, either. In order to meet the standards of beyond reasonable doubt, the prosecutors could use the theory of increased risk for objective imputation. Intention becomes objectification in modern criminal law theory, so the prosecutors could prove the defendant had intention by objective evidences. The fact that the defendant had possibility to know that his action was illegal is also the object of proof.
关 键 词:环境公害 客观归责 癌症村 故意客观化 违法性意识
分 类 号:D922.66[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15