检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄秉文[1] 方咏红[1] 周莉莉[1] 卢颖瑜[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市第二人民医院内分泌科,528000
出 处:《临床合理用药杂志》2012年第24期38-39,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
摘 要:目的比较不同序贯法在绝经后骨质疏松症中的应用效果。方法随机选取2007年2月—2011年4月来我院就诊的82例绝经后骨质疏松症患者,平均分为实验组和对照组。实验组(41例)患者采用ADFR序贯法进行治疗,对照组(41例)患者采用DFR序贯法进行治疗。在此期间,每6个月对两组患者的腰椎及近端股骨密度,胸腰段的X光片和实验室检查所得的各项数据进行记录比较。结果两组记录到的腰椎及近端股骨密度,胸腰段的X光片和实验室检查所得的各项数据比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ADFR序贯法比BFR序贯法增加的A期用药治疗,不能增加治疗效果。Objective To study different sequential sequential application in the treatment of Postmenopausal osteopo- rosis. Methods The 82 patients from February 2007 to April 2011 in our hospital for treatment of patients withPostmenopausal osteoporosis were divided into 2 groups. Experimental group, 41 patients the ADFR sequential treatment, 41 patients of the con- trol group the DFR sequential treatment during this period, every six months on bone mineral density of lumbar spine and proximal shares of the two groups of patients, thoracolumbar X - rays and laboratory tests obtained from the data recorded. Results Bone mineral density of lumbar spine and proximal shares, the experimental group and control group recorded thoracolumbar X -rays and laboratory tests obtained from the data by statistical analysis There was no significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion ADFR sequential than the BFR sequential increase of drug treatment, can not increase the therapeutic effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.154.109