论行政程序瑕疵的司法审查——以我国立法、司法和学理的矛盾与协调为视角  

On the Judicial Review of the Defects of Administrative Procedure

作　　者：于冠雄[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学

出　　处：《江苏广播电视大学学报》2012年第4期81-86,共6页Journal of Jiangsu Radio & Television University

摘　　要：在程序瑕疵的处理上,充分考虑程序对实体结果的影响,是我国司法实践的普遍做法。但我国现行法却规定对违反程序的行政行为效力一律否定,这种法律与实践的冲突给理论研究带来了困难,也使得司法判决的公正性受到质疑。此外,实践中所遵循的"利益权衡下的实体审查"方式,在审查标准方面存在诸多问题,偏重于实体利益而轻视了程序价值,究其根本在于忽视了程序瑕疵对相对人的"权益影响可能性"这一核心理念,而过分追求实然性的结果公正。It＇s been the common action taken Chinese judicial practice that taking a deep consideration upon the effect that the ad- ministrative procedure could have on the substantial result when it comes to the issue of coping with the procedural defects. How- ever, the current legislation of China has denied the effect of the administrative conduct violating procedure. The conflict between legality and practice not only incurs difficulties to the theoretical research, but also brings doubt to the justice of judicial judgment. Besides, the means of the substantial review under the interest weight system, which has been implemented in practice, has prove to involve a wide range of problems on the review standard, especially that it gets a bias on the substantial interest and ignores the procedural value. What＇s most fundamental is that it neglects the possibility of the effect that procedural defects have on the rights and interests of the interested party, and has an excessive pursuit of the substantial results.

关 键 词：程序瑕疵 司法审查 正当程序 利益权衡 实体审查 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]