文学批评:“中国经验”的误区  

The Misunderstanding of "Chinese Experience"

作　　者：周维东[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《成都大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期64-67,125,共5页Journal of Chengdu University (Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目"延安时期(1936-1948)党的文化战略与文学生产研究"中期成果(批准号:09XZW012)

摘　　要：近来在批评界炙手可热的"中国经验",反映出现代以来中国理论界长期存在的两大理论误区:将文化意义上的"中国"的内涵简化为"传统";将中国现代文学简单认为是继承中、西方文学经验的产物。"中国经验"的误区要求我们在中、西文化碰撞的格局中,正确理解"文化身份"和"文化创造"的意义。＂Chinese experience＂, a recent hottest topic in critics, reflects two serious misunderstandings long standing in the modem Chinese theoretical circles： the connotation of ＂China＂ on the cultural significance simplifled as ＂tradition＂ ; modem Chinese literature rudely considered as the outcome of heritage of both the Chinese and the Western literary experience. To avoid such misunderstandings, it is important to make clear the meaning of ＂cultural identity＂ and ＂cultural creation＂ in the collision of Chinese and Western cultures.

关 键 词：文学批评 中国经验 文化身份 文化创造 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]