范围、观念与标准——麦卡拉对安克斯密特叙事实体理论的全面质疑  

Spectrum,Concept and Criterion——Questioning Ankersmit's Narrative Substance Theory by McCullagh

作　　者：李恒[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学历史文化学院 [2]河南大学世界历史研究所 [3]中国社会科学院研究生院世界历史系

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2012年第2期120-124,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：弗兰克.安克斯密特在其《叙事的逻辑》一书中提出了叙事实体理论,其观点激进,学界对此褒贬不一,麦卡拉是最严厉的批评者。麦卡拉挑战叙事实体理论的适用范围,认为它并不适用于所有的历史撰述;质疑叙事观念论的合法性,认为它不足以支撑叙事实体;拷问衡量历史叙事优劣的标准,提出了相关性和可理解性作为客观性的重要补充。Frank Ankersmit proposed his narrative substance theory in Narrative Logic： A Semantic Analysis of the Historian＇s Language, the first book written by himself. Scholars got different assessments on this book because of its radical viewpoints. McCullagh criticized the narrative substance theory severely from three aspects： the appliance spectrum, the legality of narrative idealism and the criterion of measuring historical narration.

关 键 词：安克斯密特 麦卡拉 叙事实体 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]