检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李莉莎[1]
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第6期51-57,162,共7页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<第三方电子支付法律问题研究>(项目批准号:10YJC820060)
摘 要:我国对第三方电子支付的法律规制主要在金融监管方面,而各当事方的民事法律关系仍不清晰,由此产生大量法律风险,包括未经授权的支付风险、支付瑕疵风险、基础交易的抗辩延伸风险、资金沉淀风险等。在风险分配与化解方面,若适用一般合同法或侵权法原则,可能会造成各当事方之间的利益不平衡。因此,应突破传统民法思维,从实际出发进行第三方电子支付的专门立法,协调各方民事权益,促进第三方电子支付产业的发展。In our country,the legal legislation of the third-party electronic payment focuses on the financial supervision,but the civil legal relationship of the parties remains indefinite and a lot of legal risks are turned out,which stem from unauthorized payment,payment flaws,the extending flea of basic transaction,funds precipitation,and so on.If principles of contract law or tort law are applied to distribute or dissolve the risks,the parties' interests may become unbalanced.Therefore,to coordinate the parties' rights and to promote the third party electronic payment industry,traditional civil thinkings should be changed,and the third party payment laws should be made on the basis of a practical point of view.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13