检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]泸州医学院附属医院康复医学科,四川泸州646000
出 处:《泸州医学院学报》2012年第4期413-415,共3页Journal of Luzhou Medical College
摘 要:目的:观察骶管滴注联合腰椎牵引对急性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,为临床治疗急性腰椎间盘突出症探求新方法。方法:178例确诊为腰椎间盘突出症急性发作的患者随机分为两组:实验组90例,予以骶管滴注联合腰椎牵引治疗;对照组88例,仅予腰椎牵引治疗。评估两组患者治疗前、后疼痛缓解程度,治疗效果。结果:两组患者治疗后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分比较治疗前均有下降,两者间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);并且实验组VAS评分下降程度较对照组明显,两者间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组治愈率78.9%,有效率94.5%;对照组治愈率46.6%,有效率78.4%,两组间疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:骶管滴注联合腰椎牵引治疗急性腰椎间盘突出症,使患者疼痛症状缓解明显,效果比单纯使用腰椎牵引物理治疗显著。Objective: To observe the clinical therapeutic effect of sacral canal injection plus vertebra traction for the treatment of acute lumbar disc protrusion.Methods: 178 patients were selected and divided into experimental group and control group.The experimental group was treated by sacral canal injection combined with vertebra traction,while the control group was treated by vertebra traction only.The clinical symptoms and signs were assessed before and after treatment.Results: The VAS of the experimental group was better than that of the control group after treating(P0.05).The recovery rate of two groups was 78.9% and 46.6%,while the effective rate of two groups was 94.5% and 78.4% respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05).Conclusion: The treatment for acute lumbar disc protrusion by sacral canal injection combined with vertebra traction is less painful,more effective and acceptable.It may have a better effect than traction therapy alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.217.190