检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈博[1] 廖祖维[1] 王靖岱[1] 俞欢军[1] 阳永荣[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学化学工程与生物工程学系、化学工程国家重点实验室,浙江杭州310027
出 处:《石油学报(石油加工)》2012年第4期662-669,共8页Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(21106129);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2012CB720500);教育部博士点基金项目(20110101120019)资助
摘 要:烃类蒸汽转化法是目前工业产氢的主要工艺,而高能耗和高碳排放是制约这一工艺发展的瓶颈因素。采用分析方法对烃类蒸汽重整工艺进行了系统的考察。对天然气蒸汽重整制氢(SMR)过程考察了重整反应转化温度和水/碳摩尔比对系统效率和单位H2碳排放的影响,确定了在考察的范围内最佳的操作条件。比较了3种制氢原料在各自典型操作条件下的系统效率及单位H2碳排放量。系统效率由大到小的原料依次为天然气(0.676)、液化气(0.638)和石脑油(0.635),而单位H2碳排放由大到小的顺序与之相反。基于相对负荷的概念,推导了系统效率与子单元效率的关联式,并以此为基础在子单元的层面上分析了系统效率变化的根本原因,给出了具体的调优策略。Steam reforming of hydrocarbons is the main process of industrial hydrogen production,however,the process is strongly limited by its high energy consumption and carbon emission.Systematic evaluation of the process was performed by using exergy analysis.For steam methane reforming,the exergy efficiencies and carbon emission for unit H2 production were evaluated with variation of reformer temperature and steam to carbon molar ratio.The optimal operation conditions were identified in the investigation range.The steam reforming processes with natural gas,naphtha and liquefied petroleum gas(LPG) as raw materials,respectively,were compared.The system exergy efficiency for natural gas,LPG,naphtha were 0.676,0.638 and 0.635,respectively.An analytical expression for the relationship between efficiencies of subunits and system exergy efficiency was obtained and used to investigate the steam reforming process on the sub-unit level,by which the strategies were proposed to improve the system exergy efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249