检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院普外科,北京100029
出 处:《临床外科杂志》2012年第8期551-553,共3页Journal of Clinical Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除辅助小切口胆总管探查治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的诊治经验及应用价值。方法回顾性分析142例患者的临床资料,142例分为腹腔镜胆囊切除+小切口辅助胆总管探查术组(A组)、腹腔镜胆囊切除+胆总管探查术组(B组)和开腹手术组(C组),比较三组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、腹腔引流量、住院时间及并发症发生率。结果A组患者手术时间与B组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),肠功能恢复时间、住院时问与C组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论小切口辅助腹腔镜胆囊切除合并胆总管结石的治疗安全可行,但应根据情况采用个体化的治疗方法。Objective To discuss the application value of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) and common bile duct exploration combined with small incision and the experience of diagnosis and treatment. Methods The clinical data of 142 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocbolithiasis were retrospec- tively analyzed. These patients were divided into the three groups, group A:laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( LC ) and common bile duct exploration combined with small incision, group B : Laparoscopic cholecystecto- my and common bile duct exploration, group C:open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration. The duration of surgery, bleeding, postoperative recovery, quantity of flowing liquid from abdominal cavity after operation, time of stay and postoperative complications among 3 groups were compared. Results There was a significant difference on duration of surgery between group A and B( P 〈 0.05 ). There was a significant difference on postoperative recovery and time of stay between group A and C ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) and common bile duct exploration combined with small inci- sion is safe and feasible,but the treatment method of choice must be individualized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145