瓦楞纸板边压强度2种测试方法的分析比较  

Comparison of Two Edgewise Crush Test Methods of Corrugated Fiberboard

作　　者：周颖红[1] 郭仁宏[1] 黎敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东出入境检验检疫局检验检疫技术中心,广州510623

出　　处：《包装工程》2012年第17期63-67,共5页Packaging Engineering

基　　金：中国质量监督检验检疫总局科研项目(2011IK257)

摘　　要：通过采用边缘不上蜡法和边缘补强法测试瓦楞纸板的边压强度,用SPSS数据统计软件分析比较了2种测试方法在进行纸箱抗压力预测计算时的拟合优劣,引用Eulerian弹性受压变形理论论证,从实验和理论上证明了2种边压强度测试方法在用于马基公式计算纸箱抗压力预测值时的可替代性。分析指出了用凯里卡特公式预测计算纸箱抗压力时,用边压强度代替原纸的综合环压,其抗压力预测值与实测值的拟合度更高。Edgewise crush strength of corrugated cardboard was tested using un--waxed edge method and edge reinforced method. The advantages of the two methods in fitting for the cardboard compression strength predic- tion were analyzed and compared using SPSS software. The fungibility of the two methods in cardboard com- pression strength prediction based on Makee formula was proved empirically and theoretically using Eulerian e- lastic compressive deformation theory. It was concluded that when using the Kellicutt formula to calculate the compression strength, the fit statistics of the predicted compression strength with lab test readings is higher when replace the edge crush strength with the integrated ring crush of base paper.

关 键 词：边压强度 测试方法 补强 抗压力 比较 

分 类 号：TB484.1[一般工业技术—包装工程] TB487