检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山西高等学校社会科学学报》2012年第8期64-67,共4页Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi
摘 要:我国宪法和刑事诉讼法确立了检察机关对侦查权进行法律监督的原则,其内容含有控制之义,但控制权限不够,监督的方式具有片面性。考察国外检警关系模式,分析我国检警关系的现状和不足,针对我国检察机关对立案监督消极被动、监督缺乏强制力、提前介入缺乏规范性、强制监督不力等问题,提出以"检察控制侦查"的监督模式来重新建构我国的检警关系。According to China's Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Law,the procuratorial organs are authorized to execute legal supervision of investigation. This principle embodies the power of control, though rather limited with one - sidedness of supervising methods, Based on a comparison with the procurator police relationship in foreign countries ,this ar- ticle makes an analysis about the status quo and inadequacy of this relation in China, and puts forward a proposal that we should adopt a mode of "investigation under procuratorial control" to rebuild the relationship between the procurator and the police.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.2.199