检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学,辽宁大连116600 [2]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《行政与法》2012年第8期90-94,共5页Administration and Law
摘 要:在调整人身侵权债权的各种制度中,为人身侵权债权在破产清偿顺位中找寻优先清偿点是次优制度选择,因为无论人身侵权债权定位在哪一个清偿层面都是后序债权人为破产企业的非法行为买单。为此,在其他法律制度足以保护人身侵权债权人权益的前提下,在破产清偿顺位中为人身侵权债权人设置优先受偿权实属不必要。但是其他法律制度不足以保护人身侵权债权人的权益时,我们可以考虑在破产清偿顺位中采用将人身侵权债权与劳动者债权同序的方式来保护人身侵权债权人的合法权益。in the any system of adjustment of personal tort claims,the system which legislation look for pay off point for personal tort claims in the bankruptcy liquidation sequence is the second system selection.Because whatever personal tort claims locate,the behind sequence creditor pays for the bankrupt enterprise illegal behavior.Therefore,if the other legal system enough to protect the rights of personal tort creditor,we set the priorities right under Bankruptcy Liquidation sequence for personal tort creditor,which is really unnecessary.But other legal system does not do enough to protect the rights of personal tort creditor,we may consider the same way to protect personal tort creditors and the employee in the bankruptcy liquidation sequence to protect the legal rights of the personal tort creditors.
关 键 词:人身侵权债权 破产清偿顺位 次优制度选择 非自愿性 剩余债务免除例外制度
分 类 号:D922.291.92[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117