中药内服外敷治疗亚急性甲状腺炎临床疗效观察  

Clinical Observation of Subacute Thyroid Treatedby Internal and External Treatment of Traditional Chinese Medicine

作　　者：崔鹏[1] 高天舒[1] 梅兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁中医药大学附属医院内分泌科,辽宁沈阳110032

出　　处：《中华中医药学刊》2012年第9期2032-2034,共3页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：辽宁省卫生厅高峰建设项目(2010056);辽宁省科技厅资助项目;辽宁中医药大学附属医院科研基金资助项目

摘　　要：目的:探讨以中药内服外敷联合治疗亚急性甲状腺炎的临床疗效观察。方法:将120例亚急性甲状腺炎的患者分为中药联合治疗组和西药对照组,比较治疗前后临床症状、实验室检查及复发比率。结果:治疗3个月后中药组临床疗效明显优于对照组,且实验室检查及复发率明显优于对照组。治疗组治愈38例,好转15例,未愈7例,总有效率88.33%;对照组治愈27例,好转14例,未愈19例,总有效率68.33%。两组疗效比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:中药内服及外敷联合治疗亚急性甲状腺炎临床疗效确切,且优于单纯西药组。Objective： To investigate the curative effect of subacute thyroid disease treated by internal and external treatment of traditional Chinese medicine. Method： 120 cases of thyroid inflammation were divided into subacute tradition- al Chinese medicine combined treatment group and western medicine control group, comparin~ clinical symptoms before and after treatment,laboratory examination and recurrence rate. Results： 3 months after treatment clinical curative effect of Chinese traditional medicine group was better than that of control group, and laboratory examination and the recurrence rate were better than those of control group. The treatment group had 38 cases improved, 15 cases were recovered and 7 cases unrecovered, the total effective rate was 88.33% ;the control group had 27 cases improved, and 14 cases were satis- factory in 19 cases,the total effective rate was 68.33%. The curative effect of two groups was significantly different （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion： Herbal internal and external treatment and combination therapy for subacute thyroid inflammation has exact clinical curative effect, and better than single western medicine group.

关 键 词：中药 内服外敷 亚急性甲状腺炎 

分 类 号：R581.4[医药卫生—内分泌]