危险驾驶罪罪过等问题之规范研究  

A Normative Research on Criminal Fault in the Crime of Dangerous Driving

作　　者：王耀忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2012年第5期121-130,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：陕西省教育厅省级人文社科基地重点科研计划项目(2010JZ40)"现代风险社会对刑法的挑战"

摘　　要：危险驾驶罪是抽象危险犯,危险的实现并非其构成要件要素,危险的载体为追逐竞驶行为或醉酒驾驶行为自身。在具体危险犯中,危险的实现是构成要件要素,危险与行为分离,其载体为刑法保护的具体人或物。因罪过是对客观构成要件要素的认知与所持的态度,故在没有罪过阻却事由的情况下,行为人只要认识到自己是在道路上追逐竞驶或醉酒驾驶就意味着对与行为相伴随的抽象危险的希望或放任,动机可能是从抽象危险中寻求刺激或为了某一目的而放任抽象危险的发生等。在刑法没有明文规定过失可以构成本罪的情况下,本罪的罪过只能是故意。法定刑的高低并不必然决定罪过的性质,法定刑的轻重还与犯罪的客观方面相关。罪过也不能仅从社会意义与便于司法操作的角度认定。对危险驾驶罪的体系性考察,应结合社会现实从刑法规范动态不平衡、相互协调的角度才能得出合理的结论。The crime of dangerous driving is an abstract dangerous offence. The realization of danger is not a constitutive element and the carrier of danger is the behavior of pursuit of driving or drunken driving itself. In a concrete dangerous crime, however, danger has separated from dangerous behavior and its realization is constitutive element and its carrier is the concrete person or property protected by criminal law. Because fault is the cognition and attitude toward the objective constitutive element, without the ground for elimination of fauh, the doers cognition of pursuit driving or drunken driving on the road means hope or indifference for abstract danger accompanied with behavior and the motive may seek for stimulation from the abstract danger or let alone the occurrence of abstract danger etc. Without express provisions in the Penal Code to make clear that crime of dangerous driving may constitute in negligent cases, it could only be intentional offence. Fault could not be determined only from social significance or ease operation of justice. From the system of criminal law, a rea- sonable conclusion may be achieved only if it is combined with social reality from the imbalance and coordination of criminal norm.

关 键 词：危险驾驶罪 罪过 抽象危险 关联犯罪 

分 类 号：DF622[政治法律—刑法学]