检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波315211 [2]宁波市鄞州区人民检察院,浙江宁波315100
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2012年第5期156-161,共6页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(07SFB2039)
摘 要:在专利的标准化及其实施过程中,有可能出现专利权的滥用现象,特别是专利权的垄断行为。技术标准中专利权垄断行为导致专利制度的异化,破坏了知识产权制度的利益平衡原则,并扭曲了公平自由的国际市场经济秩序。美国的反托拉斯法、欧盟的竞争法和日本反垄断法体现了对该种垄断行为的基本态度和解决路径,起到积极的规制作用。我国的《反垄断法》一定程度上加强了对滥用知识产权行为的规制,但并不能全面解决国际贸易中产生的众多垄断行为或者限制竞争行为。在技术标准越来越成为新的技术壁垒的背景下,积极借鉴欧盟和美国等的相关立法,根据我国的国际竞争政策需要,构建我国规制技术标准中的专利权滥用行为的法律体系已成当务之急。In the process of making patent standardization and putting standard in practice, the abuse of patent right and patent monopoly appears. Patent abuse in technology standards led to alienation of the patent system, undermining the principle of balance between the interests of the IP system and distorting the free and fair international market economic order. U.S. antitrust law and EU dompetition law and Japan anti - monopoly law reflect the basic attitude and solution path of the kind of monopolistic behavior, making the positive regulation effect. China's anti - trust law, to some extent, on the strengthening behavior of the abuse of intellectual property regulation, they can not produce a comprehensive solution to the many international trade monopoly and restriction of competition act. In the background that technical standards is increas- ingly becoming the new technical barriers, China may learn from the legislation of U. S., EU and international practices in regulating patent misuse in technology standard, then, based on Chinese double legislation aims, establisha legitimate system of patent abuse in technology standard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.199