检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东工商学院公共管理学院,山东烟台264005
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2012年第9期34-37,共4页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金(11CRK017);教育部人文社科研究项目(12YJC840033);山东省高校人文社科研究计划项目(J11WG14)
摘 要:目的:深入研究卫生保健商品或服务的相对价格对人均卫生费用的短期与长期影响。方法:基于1986—2009年宏观时间序列数据,在考虑人均GDP、政府卫生投入等因素前提下,采用自回归分布滞后模型(ARDL)与误差修正模型(ECM)进行分析。结果与结论:⑴卫生保健商品相对价格对于人均实际卫生费用的影响要明显大于卫生保健服务相对价格和政府卫生投入比例增长率的影响;⑵相对于其他消费品,卫生保健商品相对价格的持续下降会促使人均实际卫生费用增长率也呈现下降趋势;卫生保健服务相对价格的下降可能会刺激人们卫生保健服务需求,提高实际人均卫生费用的增长率;⑶政府卫生投入比例的上升会导致实际人均卫生费用增长率增加,产生明显的正向效应。Objective: To explore the short and long tern1 effects of relative price of goods of heahh care on health expenditures per capita. Methods: Based on macro time series data, through taking into account factot~ such as per capita GDP, government health input provided, auto-regressive distributed lag models (ARDL) and en'or correction model (ECM) are established to analyze the effects. Results and Conclusions: (1) The effects of relative prices of health care goods on real health expenditure per capita are much greater than the relative price of t^ealth care services and the growth rate of government investment in health care. (2) Compared with other goods, the decreasing of relative prices of heahh care goods would promote the decreasing of real heahh expendition per capita; The decline in relative prices of health care services could stimulate the demand for health care services and increase the actual growth rate of per capita heahh expenditure. (3) Increasing in the proportion of government health input will cause an increase in real per capita heahh expenditure growth, which has a significant positive effect.
关 键 词:卫生保健商品相对价格 卫生保健服务相对价格 人均卫生费用 ARDL模型
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15