双宾语结构之附缀化假说  

A Cliticization Hypothesis of the Double-object Construction

作　　者：赵春生[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆交通大学,重庆南岸区400074

出　　处：《重庆文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期111-116,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences（Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：与单宾语结构相比,双宾语结构的独特之处在于其一个动词同时与两个宾语相互作用。研究发现:理论分析无法合理解决直宾与间宾的赋格和题元角色分配等问题,从而导致对双宾语结构本身的质疑;间宾的非刚性、历史证据和类型学证据都不支持双宾语结构的合法地位;所谓的双宾语结构是与格结构中与格介词附缀化的结果。Compared with the mono-object construction, the double-object construction （DOC） is idiosyncratic in that it is a construction in which one verb interacts with two NPs as objects. Based on our recent research, we find that some problems con- cerning the DOC, such as the case assignment and the theta-role assignment of the two objects, can not be appropriately solved. As a result, the validity of the DOC per se is called into query. Evidence from the non-rigidity of the indirect object, the history of the DOC, and the typological analysis of the DOC supports the claim that the DOC is an illusion. As a way out, the so-called DOC is supposed to be a representation of the dative construction （DC） resulting from cliticization.

关 键 词：双宾语结构 与格结构 附缀化 

分 类 号：H043[语言文字—语言学]