检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学经济管理学院,成都610031 [2]河北科技师范学院工商管理学院,河北秦皇岛066004
出 处:《系统管理学报》2012年第5期668-677,共10页Journal of Systems & Management
基 金:四川省科技支撑计划项目(2011SZ0228)
摘 要:研究保留价格差异和通道费对3种竞争渠道均衡结果和均衡结构的影响,通过对格力和美的渠道结构选择进行案例分析来验证均衡结构的结论,比较了3种竞争渠道下的产品差异化、消费者剩余以及社会福利,最后,从成本差异和网络外部性2个角度对基本模型进行拓展。结论表明:当零售商收取较高通道费时,制造商将自建分销渠道或重新选择其他零售商;消费者剩余在II下最高,社会福利在DD下最低;普通品牌制造商能够通过降低产品成本削弱知名品牌的竞争优势;网络外部性将加剧市场竞争,降低渠道成员利润。The paper investigates the effect of reservation price difference and slotting allowances on equilibriums and equilibrium structures of three competing channels. A case study is conducted to validate the conclusion about the equilibrium structures choice of Gree and Midea. Then, product differentiation, consumer surplus and social welfare of three competing channels structures are compared. The paper expands the basic model from two perspectives of cost difference and network externalities. The study shows that manufacturers will self-build distribution channel or reselect other retailers if slotting allowance is too high. Consumer surplus is highest in II, and social welfare is lowest in DD. Common brand manufacturer may weaken the competitive advantage of famous brand manufacturer through reduced product cost. Under network externalities, market competition will increase, and channel members' profits will reduce.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222