治痢散治疗溃疡性结肠炎疗效分析  

作　　者：向未[1] 刘菊容[1] 杨伟兴[1] 肖国辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]泸州医学院附属中医院脾胃病科,四川泸州646000

出　　处：《实用中医药杂志》2012年第9期734-735,共2页Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:观察《医学心悟》治痢散水煎剂治疗湿热型溃疡性结肠炎(UC)临床疗效与安全性。方法:61例随机分成治疗组和对照组。治疗组30例口服《医学心悟》治痢散水煎剂,对照组31例口服柳氮磺胺吡啶(SASP),疗程8周,疗程结束后观察临床疗效及中医证候缓解的差异。结果:总有效率治疗组90.0%,对照组80.6%;中医证候缓解率治疗组100%,对照组90.3%;两组总有效率、中医证候缓解率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);服药后不良反应治痢散明显少于SASP。结论:治痢散治疗湿热型溃疡性结肠炎疗效明显优于SASP,且不良反应少。Objective：to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of treating ulcerative colitis （heat and dampness type）. Methods ：61cases of UC were randomLy divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment group of 30cases of oral medicine, ＂heart＂ to treat dysentery apron Decoction daily 3times, the control group of 31 cases, oral sulfasalazine （ SASP）, the course was 8weeks after the end of treatment, observe clinical curative effect and syndrome of traditional Chinese medicine to alleviate differences. Results：of treatment of damp - heat ulcerative colitis clinical efficacy,treatment group is 90.0%, significantly higher than that in control group is 80.6% ;TCM syndrome remission rate, treatment group is 100%, significantly higher than that in control group is 90.3 % ;two groups of the total efficiency, traditional Chinese medicine syndrome comparative remission rates, the differences were statistically significant （ P 〈 0.05 ） ; after taking the drug adverse reactions, and treat dysentery powder was less than SASP. Conclusion ： the curative effect of treat dysentery powder treating damp - heat ulcerative colitis is obviously superior to sulfasalazine,and less adverse reaction.

关 键 词：溃疡性结肠炎 治痢散 柳氮磺胺吡啶 

分 类 号：R256.397.41[医药卫生—中医内科学]