检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁春雅[1]
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2012年第5期58-68,共11页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基 金:作者主持的国家社科基金项目"网络服务提供者侵权责任研究"的阶级性成果(项目编号:12CFX060)
摘 要:我国采取了以归责要件为核心的网络服务提供者侵权责任立法模式。此种立法没有充分注意到免责要件对网络服务提供者侵权责任的限制作用。它仅以信息网络传播权为主要保护客体,而对其他权利缺乏周全保护。为克服这种弊端,宜采取目的性解释的方法来理解网络服务提供者的免责条款与归责条件之间的关系;在判定网络服务提供者侵权责任之前,应优先考虑免责条款适用的可能性。建议制定以免责条款为核心的网络特别法。Condition of liability is the core of the legislative China. This kind of legislation does not pay enough attention network service provider tort liability. mode of network to the restriction It takes the right of communication service provider tort liability in of the exemption clause of the through information network as main object of protection, but leaves the comprehensive protection of other rights out. In order to overcome it, teleo- logical method of interpretation should be adopted in understanding of the relationship between exemption clause and condition of liability. Before the judgment of the tort liability of network service provider, the possi- bility of the application of exemption clause is prior to be considered. It is strongly recommended that exemption clause should become crucial element of network law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3