论国际保理商与供应商前手卖方间的权利冲突  

On The New Payment Method of International Trade:The Right Conflict between the Factor and the Former Seller of the Supplier in International Fatoring

作　　者：徐学银[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学法政学院

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2012年第9期103-109,共7页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：江苏省社科基金项目"金融创新与国际保理欺诈研究"(11FXB007)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在国际保理业务中,保理商与保留了货物所有权的供应商前手卖方之间可能发生权利冲突,这种所有权保留可能会影响保理商应收账款债权的实现。一旦发生冲突,谁将享有优先权?若无条件地认定所有权保留条款可对抗第三方,将不利于保护正常的交易秩序以及善意第三人的利益,使保理商的权利处于一种不可预知的不稳定状态。反之,过分强调第三人的利益也将不恰当地消弱所有权保留的物权担保功能。当前,关于此项权利冲突的问题上尚存在许多争议,各国的立法与司法实践亦有不同。在冲突解决时,应当遵循物权优先于债权、所有权保留公示、善意诚信等原则,以平衡各方的利益。其具体解决路径包括所有权保留登记立法例下冲突的解决,以及不要求所有权保留登记立法例下冲突的解决。In International factoring, there may be right conflicts between the factor and the supplier＇s former seller who retain ownership of the goods ,which may bring adverse influence to the factor to collect the receivable accounts. Once conflict occurs, who will have priority？ If the clause of title retention can override a third party, it is not helpful to maintain the normal trade order and the interests of bona fide third parties, thus make the rights of the factor fall in an unpredictable in- stability. Conversely, too much emphasis on the interests of a third party will also inappropriately weaken the security function of the title retention. Currently, this conflict still leaves many contro- versial issues, and the attitudes to this conflict in different countries vary. When considering to re- solve this conflict, we should abide by the principles as following：the property is overriding the debt, the publicity of title retention, good faith. The specific solution methods include as following ： the so- lution of the conflict under the legislation which demands registration of title retention, and the solu- tion of the conflict under the legislation which does not demand registration of title retention.

关 键 词：国际保理 所有权保留 权利冲突 解决途径 

分 类 号：D992[政治法律—国际法学]