矿业权用益物权说的批判——兼论矿业权属性  

Criticizing Usufructuary Right Doctrine of Mining Rights——Discussion on Nature of Mining Rights

作　　者：潘龙[1] 孟繁超[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学,江苏南京210016

出　　处：《中国国土资源经济》2012年第9期21-23,54,共3页Natural Resource Economics of China

摘　　要：虽然矿业权的概念及其内容在我国规范性文件中多有涉及,但严格按照权利法定原则,其仍然只能算是一个学术概念,对此概念及其属性展开讨论意义重大。"矿业权用益物权说"受到批判的不仅因为其理论上无法自圆其说,更是其对矿业权价值目标定位不清,客体认识不足所造成的。矿业权具有财产权属性,是一种具体化的宪法意义上的公民经济权利,其区别且独立于矿产资源国家所有权。在部门法领域,将矿业权归属到经济法中更为妥当。This paper argues that strictly speaking,in accordance with bill of rights,mining rights can only be an academic concept,so we should discuss on its concept and attribute.It goes on to look at that the reasons behind the criticism of 'usufructuary right doctrine of mining rights' lie in the fact that:the incapable of self-justification in theory,the mixed-up orientation in the value goal and inadequate understanding of the object.This paper introduces that mining rights have the attribute of property;and it is concrete citizen social economic rights in constitutional sense;which is difference and independent of the state ownership of mineral resources;so it is suggested that in the field of department law,it is more appropriate for vesting mining rights into economic law.

关 键 词：矿业权 财产权 用益物权 经济法权利 

分 类 号：F407.1[经济管理—产业经济] DF462[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]