检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余冷媚[1] 吴灿奇[2] 郑云萍[1] 浦宏斌[2] 汪玉春[1]
机构地区:[1]西南石油大学,四川成都610500 [2]中国石化天然气分公司,北京100011
出 处:《油气储运》2012年第9期652-656,1-2,共5页Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
摘 要:油气储运工程常面临多种设计、施工等方案的选择或需要对设施的运行状况进行评价,通过综合评价方法可以确定方案的优劣或对管道腐蚀程度、油库安全状况等做出评价。不同的问题适用的评价方法不同,油气储运工程中常用的综合评价方法包括层次分析法(AHP)、灰色关联法、灰色物元法、模糊物元法、数据包络法、模糊综合评价法,介绍了各评价方法的基本思想、应用情况及其优缺点,并提出了相关建议,对各评价方法在油气储运工程中的应用具有参考借鉴意义。Oil & gas storage and transportation engineering often faces the selection of programs in design,construction,etc.or needs evaluation on operating conditions of facilities.Comprehensive evaluation methods can be used to determine the programs' advantages/disadvantages or evaluate the extent of pipeline corrosion,oil tankfarm safety conditions,etc.Comprehensive evaluation methods commonly used in oil & gas storage and transportation engineering include the analytic hierarchy process(AHP),grey incidence theory,gray matter element method,fuzzy matter element method,data envelop approach and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.In this paper,basic ideas,applications and advantages/disadvantages of the evaluation methods are described and relevant suggestions are proposed,which provide references to the applications of various evaluation methods in oil & gas storage and transportation engineering.
分 类 号:TE832[石油与天然气工程—油气储运工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.239.109