追溯先辈之识见:中国近代乡村社会经济史研究的“新”与“旧”  

The “New" and “Old" Argument in Research of Chinese Modern Rural Social Economic History

作　　者：李金铮[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学历史学院,天津300071

出　　处：《史学集刊》2012年第5期25-35,共11页Collected Papers of History Studies

基　　金："2009年教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-09-0480)成果

摘　　要：改革开放以来,中国近代乡村社会经济史研究取得了令人瞩目的成就。在诸多问题上,不少学者对先前的主流意见提出了挑战,发表了不同于教条主义的见解,促进了学术研究的对话与争鸣。然而,如果将学术史不是仅仅限于新中国成立以后,而是扩大视野,拉长时段,往回追溯,就会发现许多所谓的"新"观点,早在20世纪二三十年代就已有学者提出乃至进行论证了。即便是新中国成立至"文革"之前的五六十年代,虽然政治意识形态无孔不入,但严肃或比较严肃的学术研究也并未间断,仍有一些学者提出了与主流意见不同的观点,而这些观点与新时期以来的"新"观点亦极为相似。如果没有自觉的学术史意识,不了解这一学术源头,而动辄自称为"原创"性研究,就是一种缺乏清醒的自大了。在近代乡村社会经济史研究过程中,不妨放慢脚步,在前行的同时适当回顾,反思之后再往前走。只有如此,学术之路才能脚踏实地,才能实现真正的学术创新。Since the reform and opening - up, the research of Chinese modem rural social economic history has accomplished remarkable achievements. Concerning the problems of agrarian relations, tenancy relationship, agricultural management operation, household handicrafts, rural finance, properties of the rural social economic, etc, many scholars put different opinions against the former mainstream opinions. However, if we review the academic history, we can find that in fact many so - called ＂new＂ opinions had been put forward in 1920s and 1930s by some scholars. Even if in 1950s and 1960s, under the special political situation, some scholars still put different opinions against the former mainstream opinions. All these opinions were very similar to some so - called ＂new＂ opinions since the reform and opening - up. Therefore, when we research the modem rural social economic history, it is imperative that the academic history be reviewed seriously so as to realize true academic innovation.

关 键 词：乡村 社会经济史 近代 研究 

分 类 号：F329[经济管理—产业经济]