财产权的社会义务  

On the Social Obligations of Property Rights

作　　者：张翔[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,副教授北京100872

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2012年第9期100-119,207-208,共20页Social Sciences in China

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"财产法中的基本权利问题研究"(11YJC820170)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：除了必须附带补偿的征收,法律制度中还存在诸多对于财产权"不予补偿的单纯限制"。此种限制往往被视为财产权的社会义务,是私人财产为了社会公共福祉所应承受的正常负担。财产权伴随社会义务的理念,是对"所有权绝对"理念的反思,其社会经济背景是个人的基本生存状态从主要依赖私有财产到主要依赖社会关联的转变,与社会主义或者"社会国家"观有着密切联系。财产权负有社会义务的观念对财产法产生了深刻影响,在保护财产"私使用性"的前提下,消解其与社会正义之间的冲突,是现代宪法必须面对的课题。Besides the expropriation required for compensation,there also exist a large number of'pure restrictions without compensation' of property rights in legal provisions.Such restrictions are usually regarded as the social obligations of property rights,which refer to the normal burden incumbent on private property for the sake of social and public benefits.The association of property rights with social obligations is a reflection upon the idea of'absolute ownership.'Such an association has arisen from the socio-economic context in which an individual's basic state of existence has evolved from pure reliance on private property to that on social connections.Ideologically,it is closely related with socialism or the'social state'view.The idea that property rights bear social obligations has produced profound influence on the property law.Given that the'private use'of property is guaranteed,modern constitutions must try to dissolve the conflicts between the'private use'of property and social justice.

关 键 词：财产权 社会义务 所有权绝对 征收 合宪性审查 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]