检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭海艳[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院财经战略研究院,北京100836 [2]宜春学院,江西宜春336000
出 处:《税务与经济》2012年第5期93-99,共7页Taxation and Economy
基 金:作者主持的国家社会科学基金青年项目(项目编号:10CJY067);中国博士后基金特别资助项目(项目编号:201104203);中国博士后基金面上资助项目(项目编号:20100470466)的研究成果
摘 要:美国个人所得税制历经百年发展,其税制模式、税率结构以及费用扣除等方面日臻成熟、完善,且充分体现了宏观经济和社会发展的要求,发挥了较好的财政收入和收入再分配职能。比较分析中美两国个人所得税演进逻辑及改革效应,可以看出中国个人所得税制有待完善。借鉴美国税制模式,改革与完善中国个人所得税制的方向为:逐步向"综合个人所得税制"转变;降低税率的档次和边际税率;完善费用扣除制度;加大税收征管力度等。After 100 years of development, the tax model, rate structure as well as expense deduction of Ameri- can individual income tax system is getting more and more perfect. American individual income tax system fully reflects the requirements of macroeconomic and social development, and plays a significant role in fiscal revenue and income redistribution. From the comparative analysis of the logic of evolution and the effect of the reform of individual income tax system both in China and the United States, it is clearly seen that the Chinese individual income tax system needs to be improved. So, in order to reform and improve individual income tax system, the American tax system model can be viewed as reference. Meanwhile, comprehensive individual income tax system should be adopted. It is also important to reduce the tax rate level and marginal tax rate, to improve the expense reduction system and to intensify tax collection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15