检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕振超[1] 郭艳幸[1] 卜保献[1] 史相钦[1] 郭珈宜[1]
机构地区:[1]洛阳正骨医院,河南洛阳471002
出 处:《中医学报》2012年第9期1103-1104,1124,共3页Acta Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨平乐正骨手法复位、三期辨证用药及骨水泥强化对椎体骨质疏松性压缩骨折的临床效果。方法:将130例患者随机分成两组,对照组65例,行球囊撑开骨水泥成形术治疗;观察组65例,对患者行平乐正骨手法复位、三期辨证用药和骨水泥强化治疗。通过对患者椎体高度恢复率、后凸角度恢复率及疼痛缓解率的比较,了解两种不同治疗方法的临床疗效。结果:观察组在保持椎体高度、矫正后凸角和缓解腰背疼痛方面均优于对照组手术组(P<0.001)。结论:平乐正骨手法复位、三期辨证用药和骨水泥强化对椎体骨质疏松性压缩骨折可以很好地恢复椎体高度,进而矫正后凸畸形,是一种简单、安全、经济、有效的方法。Objective : To investigate the pingle orthopedic reduction three dialectical medication and bone cement augmentation of osteo- porotic vertebral compression fractures results. Methods : 130 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Observation group 65 pa- tients, adopted patients pingle manual reduction, three drug and PVP treatment ; control group of 65 distraction routine balloon angioplas- ty bone cement treatment. Patients through the recovery rate of vertebral height, kyphosis angle recovery rate and the rate of pain relief compared two different treatment methods to understand the clinical efficacy. Results:Observation group had better'efficacy to maintain vertebral body height,kyphosis angle correction and ease back pain on the surgical group than that ofthe control group (P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion:P ingle orthopedic reduction, three period medication and PVP treatment of vertebral compression fractures can be a good correction to restore vertebral height and kyphosis,is a simple, safe, economical and effective way.
关 键 词:平乐正骨手法复位 骨折三期用药 骨水泥强化术 球囊撑开椎体骨水泥成形术 骨质疏松 椎体压缩骨折
分 类 号:R274.1[医药卫生—中医骨伤科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112