海峡两岸刑事鉴定制度比较与借鉴——以刑事诉讼法修正案为视角  

Comparison and Reference of the Criminal Judicial Appraisal System between Taiwan and Mainland

作　　者：谈在祥[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042 [2]徐州医学院,江苏徐州221004

出　　处：《公安理论与实践（上海公安高等专科学校学报）》2012年第4期75-80,共6页Journal of Shanghai Police College

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(2010SJB820016);华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金项目(20113090)

摘　　要：在当代刑事诉讼中,法律之外的问题越来越依赖其他学科加以解决,刑事鉴定制度已经成为刑事诉讼制度的重要组成部分,也是实现程序公正和实体正义的基本要素。通过比较大陆与我国台湾地区刑诉法关于鉴定人的法律地位、刑事鉴定启动权、鉴定意见质证与证明、鉴定人权利保护等方面的异同,可以更好地完善大陆地区刑事鉴定制度。Finding the facts of the law in the contemporary criminal proceeding, it increasingly depends on other subjects. The criminal judicial appraisal system has not only become an important part of the criminal proceeding system, but also become the basic elements of procedural justice and substantive justice. In order to improve and perfect the criminal judicial appraisal system of Mainland, we can study the similarities and difference between Taiwan and Mainland on the legal status of the appraiser, the initiator of criminal judicial expertise, cross-examination and proof of expert＇s opinion, the rights protection of appraiser and other aspects.

关 键 词：刑事鉴定制度 比较研究 海峡两岸 专家证人 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]