检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院伤口造口护理中心,合肥230022
出 处:《临床护理杂志》2012年第4期68-70,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的观察拉合伤口对促进感染伤口愈合的效果。方法将80例患者随机分为拉合组和对照组,各40例。均为脓肿切排引流术后、外伤感染、术后感染裂开等伤口,拉合组换药处理后对伤口进行拉合,对照组换药处理后行二次缝合。并对两组平均愈合时间、疼痛感、伤口愈合满意程度及费用等进行比较。结果平均愈合时间及伤口愈合满意拉合组优于对照组,有显著性差异(P<0.05),疼痛感及医疗费用拉合组明显低于对照组,有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论拉合伤口法对于一些初期由于感染无法缝合的伤口,能有效缩短愈合时间,减轻患者痛苦及减少医疗费用。Objective To investigate the effect of adhesive strips on the heal of infectious wounds. Methods Eighty cases of patients were randomly divided into skin closure strip group(n=40)and control group(n= 40). The wounds involved cuts after abscess incision drainage, trauma infection and wound dehiscence after operation. After change of dressings and using adhesive strips, the average healing time; pain degree medical cost and the satisfaction of wound healing were evaluated. Results Compared to control group,there are difference in the average healing time and the satisfaction of wound heal- ing(P〈0. 05) in the skin closure strip group, there are significant difference in pain degree and medical cost(P〈0. 01). Conclusions Adhesive strips in infected wound is superior to the traditional suture, which could effectively shorten the healing time of the wounds; decrease medical expense and pain, and make the wound artistic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30