检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市青浦区中山医院青浦分院,上海201700 [2]上海复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院,上海201700 [3]上海交通大学附属第九人民医院,200001
出 处:《医学信息》2012年第7期499-500,共2页Journal of Medical Information
摘 要:目的比较金喉健喷雾剂与复方氯己定在治疗疱疹性口炎的临床效果。方法随机将85例疱疹性口炎患儿分为金喉健治疗组和复方氯己定对照组,金喉健组4次/d口腔局部加强治疗;复方氯己定组湿敷口内粘膜,4次/d,观察两组的治愈时间和有效治愈率。结果金喉健治疗组有效率为93.33%,对照组70%。经统计学处理差异有统计学意义。结论金喉健局部治疗疱疹性口炎的疗效明显优于复方氯已定。(P〈0.01)Objective to compare the clinical effect of Jinhoujian spray and compound chlorine in treating herpetic stomatitis. Methods 85 children who suffered from herpetic stomatitis were randomly divided into Jinhoujian spray group(group A) and compound chlorine group as control. Patients of group A used Jinhoujian spray as local treatment 4 times a day, while a wet compressing of compound chlorine to the mucous membrane of mouth were applied to the control group. The time of curing and the rate of curing were observed and compared. Result the effective rate of group A (Jinhoujian spray) was 93.33%,and the effective rate of the control group was 70%. Significant difference was detected (P〈0.01). Conclusion the Jinhoujian spray was more effective in treating herpetic stomatitis than the compound chlorine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.158.54