检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王红娟[1] 刘瑜[1] 杨洁[1] 徐斌[1] 李泱[1] 尹彤[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院老年心血管病研究所,北京100853
出 处:《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》2012年第8期584-587,共4页Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(30971259);解放军总医院科技创新苗圃基金(09KMM23)
摘 要:目的在接受低强度华法林抗凝治疗的中国患者人群中,验证华法林药物基因组学剂量预测方程的效果。方法在接受低强度华法林抗凝治疗(目标国际标准化比值INR为1.6至2.5)的226例中国患者人群中,分别比较已公开发表并符合本研究入选标准的药物基因组学方程的效果。效果评估指标包括剂量预测值位于实际值20%界限内的患者比例(20%界限内的患者比例)以及剂量预测值与实际值之间绝对误差的平均值(MAE)。结果8个入选的药物基因组学方程的平均MAE为(0.87±0.17)mg/d[(0.73-1.17)mg/d],平均20%界限内的患者比例为(43.8%±8.1%)(29.1%-52.1%)。配对比较显示,来自亚洲人群的方程的预测效果明显优于来自高加索人群的方程(OR:1.61-3.36,P≤0.02);加入INR值或CYP4F2*3的方程较未加入的方程预测效果更好[加入INR的OR:1.71(1.08-2.72),P=0.029;加入CYP4F2*3的OR:2.67(1.41-5.05),P=0.004]。结论来自亚洲人群,或者整合3个基因变异型和INR反应性的药物基因组学方程能更好地预测接受低强度抗凝治疗的中国患者人群的华法林剂量。Objective To validate the performance of multiple warfarin pharmacogenetic algorithms in Chinese patients under low intensity warfarin anticoagulation. Methods We sought to compare the performances of 8 eligible pharmacogenetic algorithms in a cohort of Chinese patients (n = 282) under low intensity warfarin anticoagulation with target international normalized ratio (INR) ranged from 1.6 to 2.5. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated by calculating the percentage of patients whose predicted dose fell within 20% of their actual therapeutic dose (percentage within 20%), and the mean absolute error (MAE) between each predicted dose and actual stable dose. Results In the entire cohort, the pharmacogenetic algorithms could predict warfarin dose with the average MAE of (0.87 + 0.17) mg/d (0.73-1.17 mg/d), and the average percentage within 20% of (43.8% - 8.1%) (29.1%-52.1%). By pairwise comparison, warfarin dose prediction was significantly more accurate with the algorithms derived from Asian patients (48.6%-50.0%) than those from Caucasian patients (29.1%-39.7%; OR: 1.61-3.36, P≤ 0.02). Algorithms with additional covariates of INR values or CYP4F2*3 performed better than those without the covariates (adding INR: OR =1.71 (1.08-2.72), P : 0.029; adding CYP4F2*3: OR=2.67(1.41-5.05), P=0.004). Conclusions Algorithms derived from Asian patients (48.6%- 50.0%) can predict more accurately than those from Caucasian patients in the Chinese patients. Construction of a refinement pharmacogenetic algorithm integrating 3 genotypes (CYP2C9, VKORC1 and CYP4F2) and INR data should be warranted to improve the warfarin dose prediction in such patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.89.150