唯物史观与实验主义——民国学界关于中国经济史研究方法的探索  

Historical materialism and Pragmatism ——The Exploration of the Research Methods of Chinese Economic History during the Republic of China

作　　者：陈峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文史哲研究院,山东济南250010

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2012年第5期53-62,共10页Qilu Journal

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目"20世纪中国马克思主义史学的学术地位研究"(10YJA770051);山东大学人文社会科学重大研究项目"西方历史计量学与中国本土化研究"(12RWZD12);山东大学儒学高等研究院学术研究项目"近代马克思主义史家的儒学观研究"

摘　　要：关于中国经济史的研究方法,民国学界存在两种基本认识,一派信从唯物史观,是为"理论派";一派接近实验主义,是为"材料派"。最初理论派高调亮相并占压倒性优势,材料派也浮出水面但声势不显。后来为矫社会史论战之弊,实验主义开始抬头,至《食货》创刊而居于主导地位。经过《食货》上的辩论,两派达成基本共识,在理论与材料之间执两而用中,最终将经济史研究引入正轨。这一结局的出现得益于《食货》上已建立起一种学者间正常的对话交流机制。There are two kinds of basic understanding in the research methods of Chinese economic history about the historian cir cle of the Republic of China： one faction believes in historical materialism, we call it theoretical faction; the other faction is close to Pragmatism, called material faction. Initially, the theoretical faction is highkey appear oll and occupy overwhelming advantage. The material faction also emerges from the water, but its momentum is not shown. Later on, in order to correct the disadvantages of social history controversies, Pragmatism began to rise and dominate until shihuo journals started pnblication. After a debate in a shihuo jour nal, both of the factions reached a basic consensus that theories and materials in history are impartial to use. It eventually got economic history studies back on the right track. Meanwhile, the discussion appeared to benefit from the shihuo journal, which set up a normal communication mechanism between scholars.

关 键 词：唯物史观 实验主义 经济史 《食货》 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]