“失败者”的历史:陈桥兵变新探  

History of "Loser":A New Study about the Chen-chiao Coup

作　　者：惠冬[1] 张其凡[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学中国文化史籍研究所,广东广州510632

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2012年第5期94-98,共5页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：以前关于陈桥兵变的研究,几乎是一部赵匡胤的"成功史",对兵变中的"失败者",即赵氏的政敌极少着墨。事实上,这些"失败者"群体并不在少数,遍布军、政枢要,他们的抵抗或不合作很大程度上影响着兵变的进程,尤其是对入城路线的选择上。作为兵变中最重要流血事件的韩通之死,往往被后代史家视为军校王彦昇的独断专杀,然而置其于兵变及之后北宋政策的走向上来看,却恰恰是赵匡胤肃清后周异己军事力量的开端。观察这些"失败者"的踪迹,可以让我们对宋初形势有一个全景式的概观。Previous research about the Chen - chiao Coup was mainly on the cause of success while the loser of coup was ignored. Actually, the group was large and occupied important posts. Their resistance or noncooperation played a great role in the coup, especially the marching line. As the only bloodshed, the death of Han Tung was once seen as the indiscriminately slaughter of Wang Yan- sheng. However,we will find out that it is just a beginning of series of removing actions designed by Chao Kung - yin when we put it into the general postcoup trend. We should get a holistie comprehension through the trace of those ＂losers＂.

关 键 词：陈桥兵变 “失败者” 韩通 赵匡胤 

分 类 号：K244.05[历史地理—历史学]