检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学环境科学与工程学院 [2]北京林业大学经济管理学院
出 处:《经济评论》2012年第5期24-33,共10页Economic Review
基 金:国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目"沿湖地区农业面源污染阻控关键技术研究"(项目编号:2007BAD87B01)的资助
摘 要:基于随机前沿生产函数分析方法,本文将农业生产中的氮磷流失作为一种要素投入测算了中国农业1992-2010年的绿色全要素生产率(GTFP)变化指数,并与传统的全要素生产率(TFP)进行了比较分析。结果表明,全国层面来看,研究期内我国农业GTFP年均增长与TFP基本相同;分解分析表明,我国农业GTFP和TFP的增长均主要依靠技术进步推动,技术效率的降低抵消了部分技术进步的效果,纳入环境要素后技术效率的下降趋势和技术进步的增长趋势都有所放缓。分区域来看,东部地区GTFP年均增幅高于其TFP,中部地区二者基本相等,西部地区前者年均增幅低于后者。Based on stochastic frontier analysis, with N/P emission variable included, the agricultural Green TFP in China during 1992 -2010 was measured and was compared with the traditional TFP. It was shown that,the average annual growth rate of agricultural GTFP was almost the same as that of TFP. The growth of agricultural GTFP and TFP were improved by technology progress and were delayed by the descent of technology efficiency. When N/P emission variable was included, the technology efficiency declined with a lower speed and the technology progress increased with a lower speed too. In eastern area,the average agricultural GTFP change index was higher than its TFP index,while in central area these two indices were almost equal and in western area the latter was higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222